The SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD) has long been a beacon for investors seeking stability in turbulent times. As a physically backed exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracking the price of gold bullion, GLD offers a compelling way to gain exposure to gold without the logistical challenges of owning physical metal. Recent economic developments, particularly the U.S. credit rating downgrade by Moody’s, have reignited interest in gold as a safe-haven asset. This blog post analyzes the reasons to consider a long position in GLD, compares it to its primary competitor, the iShares Gold Trust (IAU), and evaluates the FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) as an alternative for income-focused investors. By examining macroeconomic drivers, ETF-specific metrics, and gold’s role as a hedge, I aim to provide a clear, analytical perspective on why GLD could be a strong addition to a portfolio in today’s environment.

The Case for Gold: Why GLD Shines Post-Downgrade

Gold has a storied history as a store of value, often thriving when economic uncertainty looms. The recent downgrade of the U.S. credit rating by Moody’s has amplified concerns about the dollar’s long-term stability, making gold an attractive hedge. A downgrade signals heightened fiscal risks, including rising budget deficits and potential erosion of the dollar’s reserve currency status. These factors weaken confidence in fiat currencies, historically driving demand for gold. As a safe-haven asset, gold tends to perform well when trust in traditional financial systems falters, and the current environment is no exception.

Geopolitical tensions and trade uncertainties further bolster gold’s appeal. Ongoing trade disputes and tariff threats have fueled market volatility, pushing investors toward assets with low correlation to equities and bonds. Gold’s price has surged to record highs, reflecting strong demand from both institutional and retail investors. This momentum is evident in GLD’s massive inflows, with billions flowing into the fund in recent months, signaling robust investor confidence. These inflows, among the highest in GLD’s history, suggest that fear-driven buying could propel gold prices further, supporting a long position in GLD.

Inflation, though moderating in some respects, remains a persistent concern. Gold’s role as an inflation hedge is well-documented, as it tends to retain value when purchasing power erodes. With central banks navigating divergent monetary policies and real yields remaining compressed, gold’s attractiveness as a non-yielding asset grows. Unlike bonds, which may underperform in a low-yield environment, gold offers protection against currency depreciation, making GLD a strategic choice for portfolio diversification.

GLD vs. IAU: A Head-to-Head Comparison

While GLD is the largest gold ETF by assets under management (AUM), with over $87 billion, the iShares Gold Trust (IAU) is a formidable competitor with approximately $40 billion in AUM. Both ETFs track the LBMA Gold Price PM Index, offering direct exposure to gold’s spot price, but their differences in structure, cost, and liquidity warrant close scrutiny.

Expense Ratios: The Cost of Ownership

One of the most significant distinctions between GLD and IAU is their expense ratios. GLD charges 0.40% annually, while IAU’s fee is notably lower at 0.25%. For a $50,000 investment, GLD’s fees amount to $200 per year, compared to $125 for IAU—a $75 difference. Over a 30-year horizon, this gap compounds to thousands, making IAU a more cost-efficient choice for long-term holders. However, expense ratios are only part of the equation.

Liquidity and Trading Costs

GLD’s larger AUM translates to superior liquidity, with tighter bid-ask spreads (often $0.01–$0.02 per share) compared to IAU’s wider spreads ($0.05–$0.10). For active traders or institutional investors executing large trades, GLD’s lower trading costs can offset its higher expense ratio. High trading volume ensures GLD can handle substantial orders without significant price impact, making it ideal for those prioritizing flexibility over cost savings.

Share Price and Accessibility

Each GLD share represents approximately 0.10 ounces of gold, resulting in a higher per-share price (often exceeding $200), while IAU’s shares, representing 0.01 ounces, trade at a lower price (around $50). IAU’s lower share price appeals to retail investors or those employing dollar-cost averaging strategies, as it allows for more granular position sizing. However, GLD’s higher price does not inherently detract from its value for investors with sufficient capital.

Performance and Tracking

Both ETFs closely track gold’s spot price, with year-to-date returns of approximately 23% for GLD and 23.15% for IAU. Over a 10-year period, IAU slightly outperforms with a 10.10% annualized return compared to GLD’s 9.93%, largely due to its lower fees. However, GLD’s performance edges out IAU over shorter timeframes (e.g., one month), reflecting its liquidity advantage in volatile markets. The correlation between GLD and IAU is low (0.06), suggesting they can serve complementary roles in a diversified portfolio, though their price movements are nearly identical due to their shared underlying asset.

ESG Considerations

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores are increasingly relevant for investors. Both GLD and IAU are managed by reputable institutions (State Street and BlackRock, respectively), but their ESG profiles differ slightly due to operational practices. IAU’s custodian, BlackRock, emphasizes sustainable practices, potentially giving it an edge for ESG-conscious investors. However, neither ETF prioritizes ESG as a core mandate, so this factor may not significantly sway decisions.

Which ETF Wins?

For long-term, cost-conscious investors, IAU’s lower expense ratio makes it a compelling choice. However, GLD’s superior liquidity and tighter spreads make it better suited for active traders or those anticipating frequent transactions. Given the current economic climate, where short-term volatility may necessitate quick entries and exits, GLD’s trading advantages outweigh IAU’s cost savings for investors prioritizing flexibility.

IGLD: A Safe-Haven with Income Potential

The FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) offers a unique twist on gold investing by combining exposure to GLD with an options-based strategy to generate income. IGLD holds a long position in GLD and writes call spreads using FLEX options, aiming to produce yields exceeding short-term U.S. Treasury securities. This approach appeals to investors seeking both gold’s safe-haven qualities and regular income.

How IGLD Works

IGLD’s strategy involves selling call options to collect premiums, which are distributed as monthly income. This structure allows investors to participate in GLD’s upside while generating cash flow, making it suitable for uncertain macroeconomic environments. However, IGLD’s performance has lagged behind GLD and IAU, as its options strategy introduces additional complexity and risk. The ETF’s reliance on call spreads can cap upside potential during strong gold rallies, as seen in recent months when gold prices hit all-time highs.

IGLD vs. GLD and IAU

Unlike GLD and IAU, which offer pure exposure to gold’s price, IGLD sacrifices some upside for income generation. Its expense ratio, while not explicitly stated in available data, is likely higher than GLD’s 0.40% due to the active management of its options strategy. IGLD’s AUM is significantly smaller, suggesting lower liquidity and potentially wider bid-ask spreads. For investors prioritizing safety and simplicity, GLD or IAU are superior choices. However, IGLD could appeal to those seeking a hybrid strategy combining gold exposure with income, particularly in a volatile market where option premiums are elevated.

Macro Drivers Supporting a Long Position in GLD

Several macroeconomic factors bolster the case for a long position in GLD:

Weakening Dollar: The Moody’s downgrade underscores concerns about U.S. fiscal health, potentially accelerating the dollar’s decline. A weaker dollar historically correlates with higher gold prices, as gold is priced in dollars globally.
Geopolitical Risks: Trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainty drive safe-haven demand. Gold’s role as a hedge against such risks is evident in its recent price surge, with GLD benefiting from record inflows.
Inflation and Low Real Yields: Persistent inflation and low real yields make non-yielding assets like gold more attractive. GLD’s direct linkage to gold prices positions it to capitalize on these conditions.
Portfolio Diversification: Gold’s low correlation with stocks and bonds (often below 0.2) makes GLD an effective diversifier. During recent market corrections, GLD has outperformed traditional safe-haven assets like Treasury bonds, which have posted modest gains.
Central Bank Demand: Central banks, particularly in emerging markets, continue to accumulate gold to diversify reserves. This structural demand supports long-term price stability, benefiting GLD.

Risks to Consider

Despite its strengths, a long position in GLD carries risks. Gold does not generate income, so investors forgo dividends or interest available from other assets. Rising interest rates could dampen gold’s appeal, as higher yields make bonds more competitive. Additionally, GLD’s 0.40% expense ratio, while reasonable, erodes returns over time compared to lower-cost alternatives like IAU or GLDM (0.10%). Finally, gold’s price volatility—while lower than equities—can lead to significant drawdowns, as seen in past cycles (e.g., a 45.56% maximum drawdown for GLD).

Final Thoughts

A long position in GLD is a compelling option in the current economic landscape. The Moody’s downgrade, coupled with geopolitical risks and persistent inflation, creates a fertile environment for gold to thrive as a safe-haven asset. GLD’s liquidity, robust AUM, and direct exposure to gold prices make it a strong choice for investors seeking stability and flexibility. While IAU offers cost advantages for long-term holders, GLD’s trading efficiency aligns better with the needs of active investors navigating volatile markets. IGLD, while innovative, is less suitable for those prioritizing pure gold exposure due to its complexity and capped upside.

Investors should weigh their goals and risk tolerance. For those anticipating prolonged uncertainty, allocating 5–10% of a portfolio to GLD can provide diversification and a hedge against dollar weakness. However, frequent traders may benefit most from GLD’s tight spreads, while cost-conscious investors might lean toward IAU or GLDM. Ultimately, GLD’s role as a cornerstone of gold investing remains unchallenged, offering a reliable vehicle to capture gold’s enduring value in an increasingly uncertain world.

Noshee Khan has transformed the financial sector with Trade Genie. As the driving force behind this innovative venture, Khan combines deep market insights with a mission to empower individuals. His unwavering dedication propels Trade Genie into new territories, offering aspiring traders vital knowledge, educational resources, and real-time market analyses. Khan’s commitment to making trading accessible has garnered widespread recognition, helping countless individuals improve their financial literacy and achieve independence.

Under Khan’s visionary leadership, Trade Genie bridges the gap between novice and experienced traders, fostering a vibrant community focused on knowledge sharing and refining trading strategies. As both a pioneer and mentor, Noshee Khan drives Trade Genie to success, inspiring confidence in those navigating the complex world of finance.

Discover a wealth of trading knowledge on the Trade Genie YouTube channel. Dive into our latest webinars covering essential topics for traders. Subscribe now for valuable insights and strategies to enhance your trading skills.

Why GLD Shines: A Case for Going Long on Gold